linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] thermal/drivers/intel_powerclamp: Use powercap idle-inject framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e2b1b18a-26c7-1a45-bad1-4233024062eb@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:16:43 +0100
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        rafael@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rui.zhang@...el.com, amitk@...nel.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] thermal/drivers/intel_powerclamp: Use powercap
 idle-inject framework

On 17/01/2023 03:07, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/intel/Kconfig
> index f0c845679250..6c2a95f41c81 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/Kconfig
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ config INTEL_POWERCLAMP
>   	tristate "Intel PowerClamp idle injection driver"
>   	depends on X86
>   	depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL
> +	select POWERCAP
> +	select IDLE_INJECT

Just a question, not a comment. As IDLE_INJECT depends on POWERCAP, is 
it necessary to select POWERCAP also here ?


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog