[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5eb88bee-e1ce-422e-ca1f-dad9733ba124@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 11:52:04 -0500
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, joro@...tes.org,
will@...nel.org, dwmw2@...radead.org, robin.murphy@....com,
robert.moore@...el.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
lenb@...nel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Add IOMMU perfmon overflow handler
support
On 2023-01-16 10:20 a.m., Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 2023-01-14 6:05 a.m., Baolu Lu wrote:
>> On 2023/1/12 4:25, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> While enabled to count events and an event occurrence causes the counter
>>> value to increment and roll over to or past zero, this is termed a
>>> counter overflow. The overflow can trigger an interrupt. The IOMMU
>>> perfmon needs to handle the case properly.
>>>
>>> New HW IRQs are allocated for each IOMMU device for perfmon. The IRQ IDs
>>> are after the SVM range.
>>>
>>> In the overflow handler, the counter is not frozen. It's very unlikely
>>> that the same counter overflows again during the period. But it's
>>> possible that other counters overflow at the same time. Read the
>>> overflow register at the end of the handler and check whether there are
>>> more.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 2 +
>>> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 11 ++++-
>>> drivers/iommu/intel/perfmon.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 2 +-
>>> 4 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
>>> index dcafa32875c1..94e314320cd9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
>>> @@ -1887,6 +1887,8 @@ static inline int dmar_msi_reg(struct
>>> intel_iommu *iommu, int irq)
>>> return DMAR_FECTL_REG;
>>> else if (iommu->pr_irq == irq)
>>> return DMAR_PECTL_REG;
>>> + else if (iommu->perf_irq == irq)
>>> + return DMAR_PERFINTRCTL_REG;
>>> else
>>> BUG();
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
>>> index bbc5dda903e9..f616e4f3d765 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
>>> @@ -130,6 +130,8 @@
>>> #define DMAR_PERFCFGOFF_REG 0x310
>>> #define DMAR_PERFOVFOFF_REG 0x318
>>> #define DMAR_PERFCNTROFF_REG 0x31c
>>> +#define DMAR_PERFINTRSTS_REG 0x324
>>> +#define DMAR_PERFINTRCTL_REG 0x328
>>> #define DMAR_PERFEVNTCAP_REG 0x380
>>> #define DMAR_ECMD_REG 0x400
>>> #define DMAR_ECEO_REG 0x408
>>> @@ -357,6 +359,9 @@
>>> #define DMA_VCS_PAS ((u64)1)
>>> +/* PERFINTRSTS_REG */
>>> +#define DMA_PERFINTRSTS_PIS ((u32)1)
>>> +
>>> #define IOMMU_WAIT_OP(iommu, offset, op, cond, sts) \
>>> do { \
>>> cycles_t start_time = get_cycles(); \
>>> @@ -630,8 +635,12 @@ struct iommu_pmu {
>>> struct pmu pmu;
>>> DECLARE_BITMAP(used_mask, IOMMU_PMU_IDX_MAX);
>>> struct perf_event *event_list[IOMMU_PMU_IDX_MAX];
>>> + unsigned char irq_name[16];
>>> };
>>> +#define IOMMU_IRQ_ID_OFFSET_PRQ (DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED)
>>> +#define IOMMU_IRQ_ID_OFFSET_PERF (2 * DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED)
>>> +
>>> struct intel_iommu {
>>> void __iomem *reg; /* Pointer to hardware regs, virtual addr */
>>> u64 reg_phys; /* physical address of hw register set */
>>> @@ -645,7 +654,7 @@ struct intel_iommu {
>>> int seq_id; /* sequence id of the iommu */
>>> int agaw; /* agaw of this iommu */
>>> int msagaw; /* max sagaw of this iommu */
>>> - unsigned int irq, pr_irq;
>>> + unsigned int irq, pr_irq, perf_irq;
>>> u16 segment; /* PCI segment# */
>>> unsigned char name[13]; /* Device Name */
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/perfmon.c
>>> b/drivers/iommu/intel/perfmon.c
>>> index f332232bb345..d0fbf784c827 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/perfmon.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/perfmon.c
>>> @@ -476,6 +476,49 @@ static void iommu_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
>>> ecmd_submit_sync(iommu, DMA_ECMD_FREEZE, 0, false, 0);
>>> }
>>> +static void iommu_pmu_counter_overflow(struct iommu_pmu *iommu_pmu)
>>> +{
>>> + struct perf_event *event;
>>> + int i, handled = 0;
>>> + u64 status;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Two counters may be overflowed very close.
>>> + * Always check whether there are more to handle.
>>> + */
>>
>> Keep comment style consistent, like this
>>
>> /*
>> * Two counters may be overflowed very close. Always check whether
>> * there are more to handle.
>> */
>>
>> Same to other places.
>
> Sure.
>
>>
>>> + while ((status = dmar_readq(iommu_pmu->overflow))) {
>>
>> Unnecessary double brackets?
I think we need the double brackets to aovid compiler warnning -
"suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value"
Thanks,
Kan
>>
>>> + for_each_set_bit(i, (unsigned long *)&status,
>>> iommu_pmu->num_cntr) {
>>> + handled++;
>>
>> "handled" isn't used anywhere. Please cleanup it.
>>
>
> Sure.
>
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Find the assigned event of the counter.
>>> + * Accumulate the value into the event->count.
>>> + */
>>> + event = iommu_pmu->event_list[i];
>>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!event))
>>
>> Again, do we need a kernel trace here? This is only because the hardware
>> reported an wrong event id, right? How about a pr_warn() to let the user
>> know this?
>
> The hardware reported ID doesn't match the SW records. It's hard to say
> which one is correct. But I guess pr_warn_once() may be enough. I will
> change it in V2.
>
> Thanks,
> Kan
>
>>
>>> + continue;
>>> + iommu_pmu_event_update(event);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + dmar_writeq(iommu_pmu->overflow, status);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static irqreturn_t iommu_pmu_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>> +{
>>> + struct intel_iommu *iommu = dev_id;
>>> +
>>> + if (!dmar_readl(iommu->reg + DMAR_PERFINTRSTS_REG))
>>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>>> +
>>> + iommu_pmu_counter_overflow(iommu->pmu);
>>> +
>>> + /* Clear the status bit */
>>> + dmar_writel(iommu->reg + DMAR_PERFINTRSTS_REG, DMA_PERFINTRSTS_PIS);
>>> +
>>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int __iommu_pmu_register(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>>> {
>>> struct iommu_pmu *iommu_pmu = iommu->pmu;
>>> @@ -658,6 +701,38 @@ void free_iommu_pmu(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>>> iommu->pmu = NULL;
>>> }
>>> +static int iommu_pmu_set_interrupt(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>>> +{
>>> + struct iommu_pmu *iommu_pmu = iommu->pmu;
>>> + int irq, ret;
>>> +
>>> + irq = dmar_alloc_hwirq(IOMMU_IRQ_ID_OFFSET_PERF + iommu->seq_id,
>>> iommu->node, iommu);
>>> + if (irq <= 0)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + snprintf(iommu_pmu->irq_name, sizeof(iommu_pmu->irq_name),
>>> "dmar%d-perf", iommu->seq_id);
>>> +
>>> + iommu->perf_irq = irq;
>>> + ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, iommu_pmu_irq_handler,
>>> + IRQF_ONESHOT, iommu_pmu->irq_name, iommu);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + dmar_free_hwirq(irq);
>>> + iommu->perf_irq = 0;
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void iommu_pmu_unset_interrupt(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>>> +{
>>> + if (!iommu->perf_irq)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + free_irq(iommu->perf_irq, iommu);
>>> + dmar_free_hwirq(iommu->perf_irq);
>>> + iommu->perf_irq = 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int iommu_pmu_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
>>> {
>>> if (cpumask_empty(&iommu_pmu_cpu_mask))
>>> @@ -734,8 +809,14 @@ void iommu_pmu_register(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>>> if (iommu_pmu_cpuhp_setup(iommu_pmu))
>>> goto unregister;
>>> + /* Set interrupt for overflow */
>>> + if (iommu_pmu_set_interrupt(iommu))
>>> + goto cpuhp_free;
>>> +
>>> return;
>>> +cpuhp_free:
>>> + iommu_pmu_cpuhp_free(iommu_pmu);
>>> unregister:
>>> perf_pmu_unregister(&iommu_pmu->pmu);
>>> err:
>>> @@ -749,6 +830,7 @@ void iommu_pmu_unregister(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>>> if (!iommu_pmu)
>>> return;
>>> + iommu_pmu_unset_interrupt(iommu);
>>> iommu_pmu_cpuhp_free(iommu_pmu);
>>> perf_pmu_unregister(&iommu_pmu->pmu);
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
>>> index c76b66263467..b6c5edd80d5d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
>>> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ int intel_svm_enable_prq(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>>> }
>>> iommu->prq = page_address(pages);
>>> - irq = dmar_alloc_hwirq(DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED + iommu->seq_id,
>>> iommu->node, iommu);
>>> + irq = dmar_alloc_hwirq(IOMMU_IRQ_ID_OFFSET_PRQ + iommu->seq_id,
>>> iommu->node, iommu);
>>> if (irq <= 0) {
>>> pr_err("IOMMU: %s: Failed to create IRQ vector for page
>>> request queue\n",
>>> iommu->name);
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists