[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_PuWM2Cz7a8-q8GFVMrXHVOSP-pXSQ1QY1pRQDuU=KwBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 09:46:32 -0500
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To: Nicu Borta <nicuborta123@...il.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] amd/dcn20: Fix high mem clock with multiple displays
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 5:43 AM Nicu Borta <nicuborta123@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On RX5000 series GPUs, using a high refresh rate monitor causes the VRAM to
> always stay at the highest clock (according to AMD, this is done to prevent
> flickering).
>
> However, when using 2 monitors (e.g. one at 165Hz and another at 60Hz), then
> disconnecting the high refresh monitor, before this patch the VRAM clock didn't
> decrease like it should.
>
> This patch fixes that bug, and now, when disconnecting the high refresh rate
> monitor, the VRAM clock jumps to the minimum.
>
> Tested for a few months, I haven't noticed any visual artifacts or other errors
> (RX5700XT).
>
This has been enabled and disabled several times in the past due to
stability issues with multiple monitors reported by a number of users.
Please see commit:
commit bcfab8e35ce81e2fd3230c1575024bfde0d28c8b
Author: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Date: Thu Feb 3 10:04:58 2022 -0500
drm/amdgpu/display: change pipe policy for DCN 2.0
Fixes hangs on driver load with multiple displays on
DCN 2.0 parts.
Bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215511
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1877
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1886
Fixes: ee2698cf79cc ("drm/amd/display: Changed pipe split policy
to allow for multi-display pipe split")
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
I would suggest following up on those bug reports to see if those
users are still experiencing stability issues when changing this.
Alex
> Signed-off-by: Nicu Borta <nicuborta123@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c
> index 8a0dd0d7134b..481a15b02126 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c
> @@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ static const struct dc_debug_options debug_defaults_drv = {
> .timing_trace = false,
> .clock_trace = true,
> .disable_pplib_clock_request = true,
> - .pipe_split_policy = MPC_SPLIT_AVOID_MULT_DISP,
> + .pipe_split_policy = MPC_SPLIT_DYNAMIC,
> .force_single_disp_pipe_split = false,
> .disable_dcc = DCC_ENABLE,
> .vsr_support = true,
> --
> 2.38.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists