[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230118153236.GA33699-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 09:32:36 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, heiko@...ech.de,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kever.yang@...k-chips.com, sjg@...omium.org,
philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] dt-bindings: gpio: rockchip,gpio-bank: add
compatible string per SoC
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 01:13:23PM +0100, Johan Jonker wrote:
> Currently all Rockchip gpio nodes have the same compatible.
> Replace all the compatibles in gpio nodes to be able to
> give them a consistent ID independent from probe order or alias.
I fail to see how the compatible change affects probe order or aliases.
It is also an ABI break if there is not the existing compatible as a
fallback. State the problem you are trying to solve with this change,
not just what your solution is.
GPIO shouldn't really have an alias either IMO.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists