[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6ad4465-b991-3afa-903b-027f38239321@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:42:19 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: document the GCC clock
on Qualcomm sa8775p
On 17/01/2023 19:04, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> Add DT bindings for the GCC clock on SA8775P platforms. Add relevant
> DT include definitions as well.
Previously you had nice, clean and short "add ...." in the subject. Now
it became long "document" while no one asked for that change? What
happened? Subject space is precious, so why changing it?
"document" is a bit redundant because bindings are documentation. So
basically "document documentation"...
This applies also to other patches like the interconnect.
With fixed subject as I asked in your v1:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists