[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230118154817.97364-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:48:15 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] pwm: ab8500: Fix .apply() and implement .get_state()
Hello,
during review of my previous pwm-ab8500 patch I learned that there is a
(somewhat) publically available reference manual. Reading in it showed
that .apply() is still more broken that I assumed by just reading the
code.
This series first fixes .apply() to not be off by a factor of ~3000 and
then adds a .get_state() callback.
Note this is only compile tested as I don't have the hardware.
Also note this breaks all consumers that relied on the previously broken
behaviour.
Uwe Kleine-König (2):
pwm: ab8500: Fix calculation of duty and period
pwm: ab8500: Implement .get_state()
drivers/pwm/pwm-ab8500.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
base-commit: 1b929c02afd37871d5afb9d498426f83432e71c2
--
2.39.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists