[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8gYV81O80BtMvWm@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:03:35 -0500
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...wei.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, will <will@...nel.org>,
"boqun.feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>, npiggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
dhowells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"j.alglave" <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
"luc.maranget" <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>, akiyks <akiyks@...il.com>,
dlustig <dlustig@...dia.com>, joel <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
urezki <urezki@...il.com>,
quic_neeraju <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
frederic <frederic@...nel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Internal vs. external barriers (was: Re: Interesting LKMM litmus
test)
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 09:17:04PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 09:15:15PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Maybe we don't. Please test the patch below; I think it will do what
> > you want -- and it doesn't rule out nesting.
>
> It works like a champ on manual/kernel/C-srcu*.litmus in the litmus
> repository on github, good show and thank you!!!
>
> I will make more tests, and am checking this against the rest of the
> litmus tests in the repo, but in the meantime would you be willing to
> have me add your Signed-off-by?
I'll email a real patch submission in the not-too-distant future,
assuming you don't find any problems with the new code.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists