[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <167405896149.112512.1632034797235809699.robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 10:23:17 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/irq: add missing of_node_put() for interrupt parent
node
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:49:29 +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> After calling of_irq_parse_one(), the node provided in the of_phandle_args
> has a refcount increment by one. Add missing of_node_put in of_irq_get()
> to decrement the refcount once used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
> ---
>
> While debugging a refcount problem with OF_DYNAMIC enabled (which is
> actually the only case were node refcount are really used), I noticed that
> platform_get_irq() was actually incrementing the refcount of an interrupt
> controller node. Digging into that function shows that it calls
> of_irq_get() which calls of_irq_parse_one() and finally of_irq_parse_raw().
> Since it seems sane that the node returned in the of_phandle_args has a
> refcount incremented, I thought it is better to put the of_node_put() in
> the user even though it was hard to find any user doing so.
>
> drivers/of/irq.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists