[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230118093726.3939160-10-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 17:37:22 +0800
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
To: hch@....de, axboe@...nel.dk, dwagner@...e.de, hare@...e.de,
ming.lei@...hat.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: john.garry@...wei.com, jack@...e.cz
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/14] blk-mq: simplify flush check in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list
1. Remove check of needs_resource and ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE.
For busy error BLK_STS*_RESOURCE, request will always be added
back to list, so need_resource will not be true and ret will
not be == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE if list is empty. We could remove
these dead check.
2. Check ret of last request instead of errors
If list is empty, we only need to explicitly commit_rqs
if error happens at last request which is stored in ret. So check
ret of last request instead of errors to remove unnecessary
commit_rqs triggered by errors returned from previous request.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index c945a4602849..d4fdb01475b6 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2108,9 +2108,9 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct list_head *list,
/* If we didn't flush the entire list, we could have told the driver
* there was more coming, but that turned out to be a lie.
*/
- if ((!list_empty(list) || errors || needs_resource ||
- ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE) && q->mq_ops->commit_rqs && queued)
- q->mq_ops->commit_rqs(hctx);
+ if (!list_empty(list) || ret != BLK_STS_OK)
+ blk_mq_commit_rqs(hctx, queued, false);
+
/*
* Any items that need requeuing? Stuff them into hctx->dispatch,
* that is where we will continue on next queue run.
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists