[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n51HAkYAcGdsJ=0gbV7JRJSGt9cZ_vHPC3kDepa4rooyvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:24:40 -0600
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
yangcong <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: boe-tv101wum-nl6: Ensure DSI writes succeed
during disable
Quoting Stephen Boyd (2023-01-13 12:49:43)
> Quoting Sam Ravnborg (2023-01-13 06:52:09)
> > Hi Stephen,
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:29:41AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >
> > > After this patch the unprepare only bails out early if the bool
> > > 'prepared' flag isn't set.
> > OK, then everything is fine.
> >
>
> Doug pointed out that enable isn't symmetric because it doesn't do the
> DSI writes. I've updated the patch and I'll send a v2.
Turns out that splitting prepare into prepare and enable breaks the
display even more for me. For now this is the best patch I have and it
fixes the regression I see in v6.1 kernels. Can I get your Reviewed-by
on this patch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists