[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77fbf01f-58fc-55a2-415b-c39d991e7c96@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 21:40:52 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bhupesh.linux@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: Add CPU idle-states
On 18.01.2023 21:34, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> Add CPU idle-state nodes and power-domains in Qualcomm sm6115 SoC dtsi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
> index 478c5d009272..29c05cbb5fd7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ CPU0: cpu@0 {
> enable-method = "psci";
> next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
> qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
> + power-domains = <&CPU_PD0>;
> + power-domain-names = "psci";
> L2_0: l2-cache {
> compatible = "cache";
> cache-level = <2>;
> @@ -59,6 +61,8 @@ CPU1: cpu@1 {
> enable-method = "psci";
> next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
> qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
> + power-domains = <&CPU_PD1>;
> + power-domain-names = "psci";
> };
>
> CPU2: cpu@2 {
> @@ -70,6 +74,8 @@ CPU2: cpu@2 {
> enable-method = "psci";
> next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
> qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
> + power-domains = <&CPU_PD2>;
> + power-domain-names = "psci";
> };
>
> CPU3: cpu@3 {
> @@ -81,6 +87,8 @@ CPU3: cpu@3 {
> enable-method = "psci";
> next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
> qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>;
> + power-domains = <&CPU_PD3>;
> + power-domain-names = "psci";
> };
>
> CPU4: cpu@100 {
> @@ -92,6 +100,8 @@ CPU4: cpu@100 {
> dynamic-power-coefficient = <282>;
> next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
> qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
> + power-domains = <&CPU_PD4>;
> + power-domain-names = "psci";
> L2_1: l2-cache {
> compatible = "cache";
> cache-level = <2>;
> @@ -107,6 +117,8 @@ CPU5: cpu@101 {
> enable-method = "psci";
> next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
> qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
> + power-domains = <&CPU_PD5>;
> + power-domain-names = "psci";
> };
>
> CPU6: cpu@102 {
> @@ -118,6 +130,8 @@ CPU6: cpu@102 {
> enable-method = "psci";
> next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
> qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
> + power-domains = <&CPU_PD6>;
> + power-domain-names = "psci";
> };
>
> CPU7: cpu@103 {
> @@ -129,6 +143,8 @@ CPU7: cpu@103 {
> enable-method = "psci";
> next-level-cache = <&L2_1>;
> qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 1>;
> + power-domains = <&CPU_PD7>;
> + power-domain-names = "psci";
> };
>
> cpu-map {
> @@ -168,6 +184,41 @@ core3 {
> };
> };
> };
> +
> + idle-states {
> + entry-method = "psci";
> +
> + LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0: cpu-sleep-0-0 {
> + compatible = "arm,idle-state";
> + idle-state-name = "silver-rail-power-collapse";
> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x40000003>;
> + entry-latency-us = <290>;
> + exit-latency-us = <376>;
> + min-residency-us = <800>;
I think this value is incorrect, see:
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm-extra/devicetree/+/refs/tags/android-11.0.0_r0.56/qcom/bengal-pm.dtsi#99
> + local-timer-stop;
> + };
> +
> + BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0: cpu-sleep-1-0 {
> + compatible = "arm,idle-state";
> + idle-state-name = "gold-rail-power-collapse";
> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x40000003>;
> + entry-latency-us = <297>;
> + exit-latency-us = <324>;
> + min-residency-us = <1110>;
> + local-timer-stop;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + domain-idle-states {
> + CLUSTER_SLEEP_0: cluster-sleep-0 {
> + compatible = "domain-idle-state";
> + idle-state-name = "cluster-power-collapse";
> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x41000043>;
> + entry-latency-us = <800>;
> + exit-latency-us = <2118>;
> + min-residency-us = <7376>;
These values vary per cluster, see qcom,pm-cluster-level@2 in the
file linked above.. We should either split that, or at least take
max() of each value between the two nodes to make sure the sleep
state is exited properly on both types of cores.
Konrad
> + };
> + };
> };
>
> firmware {
> @@ -191,6 +242,59 @@ pmu {
> psci {
> compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
> method = "smc";
> +
> + CPU_PD0: power-domain-cpu0 {
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> + domain-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> + };
> +
> + CPU_PD1: power-domain-cpu1 {
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> + domain-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> + };
> +
> + CPU_PD2: power-domain-cpu2 {
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> + domain-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> + };
> +
> + CPU_PD3: power-domain-cpu3 {
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> + domain-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> + };
> +
> + CPU_PD4: power-domain-cpu4 {
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> + domain-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> + };
> +
> + CPU_PD5: power-domain-cpu5 {
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> + domain-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> + };
> +
> + CPU_PD6: power-domain-cpu6 {
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> + domain-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> + };
> +
> + CPU_PD7: power-domain-cpu7 {
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + power-domains = <&CLUSTER_PD>;
> + domain-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> + };
> +
> + CLUSTER_PD: power-domain-cpu-cluster0 {
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + domain-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
> + };
> };
>
> reserved_memory: reserved-memory {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists