[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8h+naEJmlxIjyh1@ZenIV>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 23:19:57 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/34] iov_iter: Change the direction macros into an
enum
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 11:17:41PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > > Change the ITER_SOURCE and ITER_DEST direction macros into an enum and
> > > provide three new helper functions:
> > >
> > > iov_iter_dir() - returns the iterator direction
> > > iov_iter_is_dest() - returns true if it's an ITER_DEST iterator
> > > iov_iter_is_source() - returns true if it's an ITER_SOURCE iterator
> >
> > What for? We have two valid values -
> > 1) it is a data source
> > 2) it is not a data source
> > Why do we need to store that as an enum?
>
> Compile time type checking.
Huh? int-to-enum conversion is quiet; it would catch explicit
huge constants, but that's it...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists