[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB5880C93D16EFAB301A548CDEDAC79@PH0PR11MB5880.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 23:30:04 +0000
From: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
To: "paulmck@...nel.org" <paulmck@...nel.org>
CC: "frederic@...nel.org" <frederic@...nel.org>,
"quic_neeraju@...cinc.com" <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
"joel@...lfernandes.org" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
"rcu@...r.kernel.org" <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] rcu: Remove impossible wakeup rcu GP kthread action
from rcu_report_qs_rdp()
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 03:30:14PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> When inovke rcu_report_qs_rdp(), if current CPU's rcu_data structure's ->
> grpmask has not been cleared from the corresponding rcu_node structure's
> ->qsmask, after that will clear and report quiescent state, but in this
> time, this also means that current grace period is not end, the current
> grace period is ongoing, because the rcu_gp_in_progress() currently return
> true, so for non-offloaded rdp, invoke rcu_accelerate_cbs() is impossible
> to return true.
>
> This commit therefore remove impossible rcu_gp_kthread_wake() calling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
>
>Queued (wordsmithed as shown below, as always, please check) for further
>testing and review, thank you both!
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>commit fbe3e300ec8b3edd2b8f84dab4dc98947cf71eb8
>Author: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
>Date: Wed Jan 18 15:30:14 2023 +0800
>
> rcu: Remove never-set needwake assignment from rcu_report_qs_rdp()
>
> The rcu_accelerate_cbs() function is invoked by rcu_report_qs_rdp()
> only if there is a grace period in progress that is still blocked
> by at least one CPU on this rcu_node structure. This means that
> rcu_accelerate_cbs() should never return the value true, and thus that
> this function should never set the needwake variable and in turn never
> invoke rcu_gp_kthread_wake().
>
> This commit therefore removes the needwake variable and the invocation
> of rcu_gp_kthread_wake() in favor of a WARN_ON_ONCE() on the call to
> rcu_accelerate_cbs(). The purpose of this new WARN_ON_ONCE() is to
> detect situations where the system's opinion differs from ours.
>
Thanks Paul, this is more clear for me😊.
Thanks
Zqiang
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
>
>diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>index b2c2045294780..7a3085ad0a7df 100644
>--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>@@ -1956,7 +1956,6 @@ rcu_report_qs_rdp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>{
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned long mask;
>- bool needwake = false;
> bool needacc = false;
> struct rcu_node *rnp;
>
>@@ -1988,7 +1987,12 @@ rcu_report_qs_rdp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> * NOCB kthreads have their own way to deal with that...
> */
> if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp)) {
>- needwake = rcu_accelerate_cbs(rnp, rdp);
>+ /*
>+ * The current GP has not yet ended, so it
>+ * should not be possible for rcu_accelerate_cbs()
>+ * to return true. So complain, but don't awaken.
>+ */
>+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_accelerate_cbs(rnp, rdp));
> } else if (!rcu_segcblist_completely_offloaded(&rdp->cblist)) {
> /*
> * ...but NOCB kthreads may miss or delay callbacks acceleration
>@@ -2000,8 +2004,6 @@ rcu_report_qs_rdp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> rcu_disable_urgency_upon_qs(rdp);
> rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rnp, rnp->gp_seq, flags);
> /* ^^^ Released rnp->lock */
>- if (needwake)
>- rcu_gp_kthread_wake();
>
> if (needacc) {
> rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists