[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230117194348.3f098a18@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 19:43:48 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, joabreu@...opsys.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
richardcochran@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ning Cai <ncai@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: enable all safety features by default
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:37:23 -0600 Andrew Halaney wrote:
> I've been working on a newer Qualcomm platform (sa8540p-ride) which has
> a variant of dwmac5 in it. This patch is something Ning stumbled on when
> adding some support for it downstream, and has been in my queue as I try
> and get some support ready for review on list upstream.
>
> Since it isn't really related to the particular hardware I decided to
> pop it on list now. Please let me know if instead of enabling by default
> (which the original implementation did and is why I went that route) a
> message like "Safety features detected but not enabled in software" is
> preferred and platforms are skipped unless they opt-in for enablement.
Could you repost and CC Wong Vee Khee, and maybe some other Intel folks
who have been touching stmmac recently? They are probably the best to
comment / review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists