[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8eBhaHgICkwR03N@ziqianlu-desk2>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 13:20:05 +0800
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
To: Pavel Boldin <boldin.pavel@...il.com>
CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Raphael S. Carvalho" <raphaelsc@...lladb.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Igor Seletskiy <i@...udlinux.com>, Moritz Lipp <github@....me>,
Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at>,
Michael Schwarz <michael.schwarz91@...il.com>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftest/x86/meltdown: Add a selftest for meltdown
Hi Pavel,
Hope everything is well.
I wonder if you have missed my last email? Is it OK for me to add your
reviewed-by tag to this patch?
Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 04:05:52PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 10:50:44AM +0200, Pavel Boldin wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 10:18, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 09:00:21AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > > If you do not trust what I've done is what I've claimed, now the
> > > > original author Pavel Boldin has given the patch a "LGTM" tag, does that
> > > > address your concern?
> > >
> > > I don't see that anywhere on lore.kernel.org, have a link to it?
> >
> > LGTM.
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> In Linux kernel community, reviewer normally gives a Reviewed-by tag
> when they think the patch "LGTM". And in this case, it would be a tag
> like this:
>
> Reviewed-by: Pavel Boldin <boldin.pavel@...il.com>
>
> May I translate your "LGTM" tag to the above Reviewed-by tag?
>
> BTW, the kernel community's explanation of Reviewed-by tag is here in
> case you want to take a look:
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#reviewer-s-statement-of-oversight
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
Powered by blists - more mailing lists