[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8eM1ln+uGaR5h72@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:08:22 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@...-tech.com>
Cc: hch@....de, stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/183] 6.1.7-rc1 review
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 10:14:35AM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 03:11:37PM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > fstests(generic/034, xfs) panic when 6.1.7-rc1, but not panic when 6.1.6.
> > >
> > > It seems patch *1 related.
> > > *1 Subject: blk-mq: move the srcu_struct used for quiescing to the tagset
> > > From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > >
> > > This patch has been drop from 6.1.2-rc1. and it now added in 6.1.7-rc1 again.
> > >
> > > the panic in 6.1.7-rc1 is almost same as that in 6.1.2-rc1.
> >
> > Argh, yes, let me go drop these again.
> >
> > Sasha, can you blacklist these from your tools so they don't get picked
> > up again?
>
> this panic does not happen on upstream 6.2.0-rc4.
> or maybe we need a bigger patch set?
We just need to stop attempting to backport these to 6.1 :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists