lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230118074219.3921-1-apantykhin@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:42:19 +0500
From:   Alexander Pantyukhin <apantykhin@...il.com>
To:     davidgow@...gle.com
Cc:     dlatypov@...gle.com, brendan.higgins@...ux.dev,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Alexander Pantyukhin <apantykhin@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py: remove redundant double check

The build_tests function contained double checking for not success
result. It is fixed in the current patch. Additional small
simplifications of code like using ternary if were applied (avoid using
the same operation by calculation times differ in two places).

Signed-off-by: Alexander Pantyukhin <apantykhin@...il.com>
---
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 19 +++++--------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
index 43fbe96318fe..0e3e08cc0204 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
@@ -77,11 +77,8 @@ def config_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree,
 	config_start = time.time()
 	success = linux.build_reconfig(request.build_dir, request.make_options)
 	config_end = time.time()
-	if not success:
-		return KunitResult(KunitStatus.CONFIG_FAILURE,
-				   config_end - config_start)
-	return KunitResult(KunitStatus.SUCCESS,
-			   config_end - config_start)
+	status = KunitStatus.SUCCESS if success else KunitStatus.CONFIG_FAILURE
+	return KunitResult(status, config_end - config_start)
 
 def build_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree,
 		request: KunitBuildRequest) -> KunitResult:
@@ -92,14 +89,8 @@ def build_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree,
 				     request.build_dir,
 				     request.make_options)
 	build_end = time.time()
-	if not success:
-		return KunitResult(KunitStatus.BUILD_FAILURE,
-				   build_end - build_start)
-	if not success:
-		return KunitResult(KunitStatus.BUILD_FAILURE,
-				   build_end - build_start)
-	return KunitResult(KunitStatus.SUCCESS,
-			   build_end - build_start)
+	status = KunitStatus.SUCCESS if success else KunitStatus.BUILD_FAILURE
+	return KunitResult(status, build_end - build_start)
 
 def config_and_build_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree,
 			   request: KunitBuildRequest) -> KunitResult:
@@ -145,7 +136,7 @@ def exec_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree, request: KunitExecRequest) -
 		tests = _list_tests(linux, request)
 		if request.run_isolated == 'test':
 			filter_globs = tests
-		if request.run_isolated == 'suite':
+		elif request.run_isolated == 'suite':
 			filter_globs = _suites_from_test_list(tests)
 			# Apply the test-part of the user's glob, if present.
 			if '.' in request.filter_glob:
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ