linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] firmware: zynqmp: fix declarations for gcc-13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40bf8f6c-c2a1-88cd-163a-256d8d0bb029@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2023 08:29:05 +0100
From:   Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Tanmay Shah <tanmays@....com>,
        "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
CC:     <soc@...nel.org>, Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@...inx.com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@....com>,
        Ronak Jain <ronak.jain@...inx.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: zynqmp: fix declarations for gcc-13

Hi,

On 1/17/23 21:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023, at 20:53, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> This looks good to me. Thanks for fixing this.
>>
>> Something must have gone wrong when I ran sparse check on this patch.
> 
> I don't think any of our previous tooling caught this, only gcc-13
> changed some of the behavior around enums.
> 
>> Just one question, does this patch need "fixes:" tag?
> 
> Probably a good idea:
> 
> Fixes: a5e56980cfb7 ("firmware: xilinx: Add RPU configuration APIs")
> 
> I can apply this directly to the soc fixes branch if you like
> and add that line.

I have other patches in my soc branch to send you too.
Around next week I will be sending PR for it.
I can include this one too but up2you.

Thanks,
Michal