lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <787bb142-1ade-bd48-1f6a-0da992add3d3@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2023 09:00:04 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     yanhong wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] dt-bindings: net: Add support StarFive dwmac

On 18/01/2023 02:45, yanhong wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/1/6 20:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 06/01/2023 03:59, Yanhong Wang wrote:
>>> Add documentation to describe StarFive dwmac driver(GMAC).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yanhong Wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml   |   1 +
>>>  .../bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml   | 113 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  MAINTAINERS                                   |   5 +
>>
>> Order the patches correctly. Why this binding patch is split from previous?
>>
> 
> The previous binding patch was considered to be compatible with JH7100, but after discussion,
> it is not compatible with JH7100 for the time being, so the name of binding has been modified
> in this patch.

I am not asking about name, but why this was split from the patch using
the compatible in the first time. This does not make any sense. Please
squash.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ