linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Register with perf domain before

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230118084923.m3ztfn6v3hskpad6@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2023 14:19:23 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Vincent Wang <bhuwz@....com>
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, lukasz.luba@....com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Wang <vincentwang3@...ovo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Register with perf domain before

On 18-01-23, 12:47, Vincent Wang wrote:
> From: Vincent Wang <vincentwang3@...ovo.com>
> 
> We found the following issue during kernel boot on android phone:
> 
> [    1.325272][    T1] cpu cpu0: EM: created perf domain
> [    1.329317][    T1] cpu cpu4: EM: created perf domain
> [    1.337597][   T76] pd_init: no EM found for CPU7
> [    1.350849][    T1] cpu cpu7: EM: created perf domain
> 
> pd init for cluster2 is executed in a kworker thread and
> is earlier than the perf domain creation for cluster2.

Can you please give detail of the exact code path, for mainline kernel
? I am not sure which kworker thread are you talking about here.

> pd_init() is called from the cpufreq notification of
> CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY in cpufreq_online(), which is earlier
> than that cpufreq_driver->register_em() is called.

-- 
viresh