[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8fSyVvnmoNnxiiD@alley>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:06:49 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: 张元瀚 Tio Zhang <tiozhang@...iglobal.com>
Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yuanhan Zhang <zyhtheonly@...il.com>,
"zwp10758@...il.com" <zwp10758@...il.com>,
"zyhtheonly@...h.net" <zyhtheonly@...h.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: print parent comm in sched_show_task()
On Tue 2023-01-17 08:33:56, 张元瀚 Tio Zhang wrote:
> Hi Chen,
> Thanks for your reply! I implement this according to Petr's suggestion here:
>
> > A solution would be to move the parent value to another line.
> > It would even better solve the situation when the task
> > is not alive and we could not get information about the parent:
> >
> > if (pid_alive(p)) {
> > struct parent = rcu_dereference(p->real_parent);
> >
> > pr_info("parent:%-15.15s ppid:%-6d\n",
> > parent->comm, task_pid_nr(parent));
> > }
>
> It seems do break the original format, but I guess printing 0 as ppid when the task is not alive
> would also confuse people sometimes.
Well, a task with pid 0 does not exist so it is not that bad.
But I agree that we could do better.
> For example, when people (and also most system monitor software) see ppid, they read the value in /proc/PID/status. According to task_tgid_nr_ns(), when the task is in a container with its parent outside the
> namespace, we will also see that ppid is 0 inside the container. And in our sched_show_task() here, we are calling task_pid_nr(), so the inconsistency maybe would confuse people under this scenario.
>
> So maybe this new line style would be a better choice? Or we just keep the original format and
> move the parent's info (and should we print the parent's pid again here) to a new line.
What about printing something like:
pr_info("parent:unknown\n");
or
pr_info("parent:unknown ppid:<NULL>;
or
pr_info("parent:???\n");
or
pr_info("parent:unknown (task is exiting)\n");
I slightly prefer the 2nd variant. The <NULL> string makes it rather
clear that the information is not accessible. And pid_alive() actually
does:
return p->thread_pid != NULL;
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists