[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8fjb5TsQaSGpZFW@debian>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:17:51 +0000
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/622] 5.4.229-rc2 review
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:48:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.229 release.
> There are 622 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:45:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230113):
mips: 65 configs -> no failure
arm: 106 configs -> no failure
arm64: 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2674
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists