linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v1 1/7] mm: multi-gen LRU: section for working set protection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y8dEv/YeZt+TRSlv@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2023 01:00:47 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     "T.J. Alumbaugh" <talumbau@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v1 1/7] mm: multi-gen LRU: section for
 working set protection

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 12:18:21AM +0000, T.J. Alumbaugh wrote:
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -4475,6 +4475,10 @@ static bool try_to_inc_max_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long max_seq,
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +/******************************************************************************
> + *                          working set protection
> + ******************************************************************************/
> +
>  static bool lruvec_is_sizable(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)

We don't usually do this.  Why do you want to?