[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe2e5a9c-2505-5a95-d65a-bac387f4ea71@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:33:32 +0100
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
thierry.reding@...il.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, john@...ozen.org, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt7622: Add missing
pwm-cells to pwm node
On 17/01/2023 22:39, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 07:09:32PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:20:27PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>> Specify #pwm-cells on pwm@...06000 to make it actually usable.
>>>
>>> Fixes: ae457b7679c4 ("arm64: dts: mt7622: add SoC and peripheral related device nodes")
>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi
>>> index 146e18b5b1f4..f321c6d0fd7c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi
>>> @@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ uart3: serial@...05000 {
>>> pwm: pwm@...06000 {
>>> compatible = "mediatek,mt7622-pwm";
>>> reg = <0 0x11006000 0 0x1000>;
>>> + #pwm-cells = <2>;
>>
>> 3 should be possible, too. The driver does only support one
>> polarity, so it's not really needed, but would be nice for consistency?
>>
>> Thierry, what's your take here?
>>
>> Other than that: Who would pick this up, I assume it to go via an ARM
>> tree together with the 2nd patch in this series?
The DT patch should go through my tree once all questions are answered and the
dt-binding patch got accpeted by PWM maintainer.
Regards,
Matthias
>
> The questions here are still open and both patches unapplied. :-\
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists