linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/2] selftests: KVM: Move dirty logging functions to memstress.(c|h)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y8mt3uv5iF6i/DD1@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2023 20:53:50 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] selftests: KVM: Move dirty logging functions to
 memstress.(c|h)

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023, Ben Gardon wrote:
> Woops!

Heh, and top posting too.  Me thinks you had too long of a break ;-)

> I did not mean to tag this RFC. Sorry about that. I will include a cover
> letter in the future and can resend these with one if preferred.

Eh, no need, damage done.  I was just confused.

> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:39 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Please provide cover letters for multi-patch series, regardless of how trivial
> > the series is.
> >
> > This series especially needs a cover explaining why it's tagged "RFC".