linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: document Amlogic S4 SoC PLL & peripheral clock controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:38:52 -0800
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To:     Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Cc:     "kelvin . zhang" <Kelvin.Zhang@...ogic.com>,
        "qi . duan" <qi.duan@...ogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: document Amlogic S4 SoC PLL
 & peripheral clock controller

Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com> writes:

> On 2023/1/16 16:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

[...]

>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,s4-peripherals-clkc.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,s4-peripherals-clkc.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..bbec5094d5c3
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,s4-peripherals-clkc.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */
>> 
>> Unusual license... are you sure to license the bindings under GPLv4 or
>> GPLv5? Fine by me.
>> 
>
> Yes.

The rest of the bindings for Amlogic SoCs are GPL-2.0 (without the '+').
Adding the dual-license for MIT seems fine, but adding the '+' is
curious.

It would be helpful if you could please explain why you'd like these
bindings to be licensed differently than the rest of the SoC family.

Kevin