[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iK6DZodENC8pR-toW_n5-VFyQR8X1XOuG9Lx1-kr1tmqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 05:16:13 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Sungwoo Kim <iam@...g-woo.kim>
Cc: daveti@...due.edu, wuruoyu@...com, benquike@...il.com,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"open list:BLUETOOTH SUBSYSTEM" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] L2CAP: Fix null-ptr-deref in l2cap_sock_set_shutdown_cb
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 2:35 AM Sungwoo Kim <iam@...g-woo.kim> wrote:
>
> The L2CAP socket shutdown invokes l2cap_sock_destruct without a lock
> on conn->chan_lock, assigning NULL to chan->data *just before*
> the l2cap_disconnect_req thread that accesses to chan->data.
This is racy then ?
> This patch prevent it by adding a null check for a workaround, instead
> of fixing a lock.
This would at least require some barriers I think.
What about other _cb helpers also reading/using chan->data ?
>
> This bug is found by FuzzBT, a modified Syzkaller by Sungwoo Kim(me).
> Ruoyu Wu(wuruoyu@...com) and Hui Peng(benquike@...il.com) has helped
> the FuzzBT project.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sungwoo Kim <iam@...g-woo.kim>
I would also add
Fixes: 1bff51ea59a9 ("Bluetooth: fix use-after-free error in
lock_sock_nested()")
> ---
> net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
> index ca8f07f35..350c7afdf 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
> @@ -1681,9 +1681,11 @@ static void l2cap_sock_set_shutdown_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan)
> {
> struct sock *sk = chan->data;
>
Other similar fixes simply do:
if (!sk)
return;
I would chose to use the same coding style in net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
> - lock_sock(sk);
> - sk->sk_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK;
> - release_sock(sk);
> + if (!sk) {
> + lock_sock(sk);
> + sk->sk_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK;
> + release_sock(sk);
> + }
> }
>
> static long l2cap_sock_get_sndtimeo_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists