[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8kAFr+DfJJar0yD@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 09:32:22 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/rwbase: Prevent indefinite writer starvation
On 2023-01-19 09:15:38 [+0800], Hillf Danton wrote:
> But starvation remains same given RT contenders, even if prevent is put
> on your subject line.
>
> What sense could the 4ms deadline make at best if RT contenders extend
> it to a week?
> What will happen if RT contenders are hurt by the starvation deadline?
As far as Mel's efforts go, I am satisfied so far. Maybe you can improve
it further afterwards.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists