linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 11/15] spi: dw: Add support for AMD Pensando Elba SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VfurZMfRbqDt7WRY368uu4NM3r2a6SDCogOukBZN5J8yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:58:26 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Brad Larson <blarson@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        adrian.hunter@...el.com, alcooperx@...il.com, arnd@...db.de,
        brad@...sando.io, brendan.higgins@...ux.dev,
        briannorris@...omium.org, brijeshkumar.singh@....com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, davidgow@...gle.com, gsomlo@...il.com,
        gerg@...ux-m68k.org, krzk@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, lee@...nel.org,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org,
        yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        piotrs@...ence.com, p.yadav@...com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, samuel@...lland.org, fancer.lancer@...il.com,
        skhan@...uxfoundation.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, tonyhuang.sunplus@...il.com,
        ulf.hansson@...aro.org, vaishnav.a@...com, will@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/15] spi: dw: Add support for AMD Pensando Elba SoC

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:52 AM Brad Larson <blarson@....com> wrote:
>
> The AMD Pensando Elba SoC includes a DW apb_ssi v4 controller
> with device specific chip-select control.  The Elba SoC
> provides four chip-selects where the native DW IP supports
> two chip-selects.  The Elba DW_SPI instance has two native
> CS signals that are always overridden.

...

> +struct dw_spi_elba {
> +       struct regmap *syscon;
> +};

Why can't struct regmap be used directly?

...

> +static void dw_spi_elba_override_cs(struct dw_spi_elba *dwselba, int cs, int enable)
> +{
> +       regmap_update_bits(dwselba->syscon, ELBA_SPICS_REG, ELBA_SPICS_MASK(cs),
> +                          ELBA_SPICS_SET(cs, enable));

> +

Redundant blank line.

> +}

...

> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to find %s\n", syscon_name);
> +               return -ENODEV;

return dev_err_probe();

...

> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "syscon regmap lookup failed\n");
> +               return PTR_ERR(regmap);

Ditto.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko