lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2023 10:01:26 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/34] vfs: Unconditionally set IOCB_WRITE in call_write_iter()

Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> 	Which does nothing for places that do not use call_write_iter()...
> __kernel_write_iter() is one such; for less obvious specimen see
> drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c:nvmet_file_submit_bvec()

Should these be calling call_read/write_iter()?  If not, should
call_read/write_iter() be dropped?

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ