linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the usb tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y8lEhwT3VWEn9w+R@orome>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2023 14:24:23 +0100
From:   Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Wayne Chang <waynec@...dia.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the usb tree

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 01:05:57PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 03:26:05PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The following commit is also in the tegra tree as a different commit
> > (but the same patch):
> > 
> >   2648f68bd0ac ("dt-bindings: usb: Add NVIDIA Tegra234 XUSB host controller binding")
> > 
> > this is commit
> > 
> >   20cdc1607ea0 ("dt-bindings: usb: Add NVIDIA Tegra234 XUSB host controller binding")
> > 
> > in the tegra tree.
> 
> Is that going to be a problem?  Git should handle merging that just
> fine, right?

This one shouldn't be a problem. I can also back this out of the Tegra
tree. However, I also carry

	6e505dd6804f ("arm64: tegra: Enable XUSB host function on Jetson AGX Orin")

which you picked up as

	1b17df99730a ("arm64: tegra: Enable XUSB host function on Jetson AGX Orin")

That one is a bit problematic because I had to manually apply it on top
of the Tegra tree because of some rework of the DTS files. I think this
managed to thoroughly confuse everyone and the version in linux-next is
now not what it should be.

Is there any chance you could drop it? If not I could back out the DTS
rework and schedule that for the next release. I'd rather not since I've
been trying to get that in for a while now, but it's not worth a revert
in your tree.

Thierry

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)