[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8lHQcrgyNLcXZIK@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 14:36:01 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] device property: Make
fwnode_graph_for_each_endpoint() consistent
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 08:55:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 4:21 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Make fwnode_graph_for_each_endpoint() consistent with the rest of
> > for_each_*() definitions in the file, i.e. use the form of
> >
> > for (iter = func(NULL); iter; \
> > iter = func(iter))
> >
> > as it's done in all the rest of the similar macro definitions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> and I think that you need to resend it and CC Greg (who picks up
> device property patches nowadays).
I can grab it from here, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists