[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8imx/UQB/W/yONu@ZenIV>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 02:11:19 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/34] iov_iter: Pass I/O direction into
iov_iter_get_pages*()
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:15:44AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 11:03:52PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 11:57:08PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 11:08:24PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > > > Define FOLL_SOURCE_BUF and FOLL_DEST_BUF to indicate to get_user_pages*()
> > > > and iov_iter_get_pages*() how the buffer is intended to be used in an I/O
> > > > operation. Don't use READ and WRITE as a read I/O writes to memory and
> > > > vice versa - which causes confusion.
> > > >
> > > > The direction is checked against the iterator's data_source.
> > >
> > > Why can't we use the existing FOLL_WRITE?
> >
> > I'm really not fond of passing FOLL_... stuff into iov_iter
> > primitives. That space contains things like FOLL_PIN, which makes
> > no sense whatsoever for non-user-backed iterators; having the
> > callers pass it in makes them automatically dependent upon the
> > iov_iter flavour.
>
> Actually, looking at that thing... Currently we use it only for
> FOLL_PCI_P2PDMA. It alters behaviour of get_user_pages_fast(), but...
> it is completely ignored for ITER_BVEC or ITER_PIPE. So how the
> hell is it supposed to work?
>
> And ITER_BVEC *can* get there. blkdev_direct_IO() can get anything
> ->write_iter() can get, and io_uring will feed stuff to it. For
> that matter, ->read_iter() can lead to it as well, so
> generic_file_splice_read() can end up passing ITER_PIPE to that
> sucker.
>
> Could somebody give a braindump on that thing? It looks like we
> have pages that should not be DMA'd to/from unless driver takes
> some precautions and we want to make sure they won't be fed to
> drivers that don't take such. With checks done in a very odd
> place...
PS: Documentation/driver-api/pci/p2pdma.rst seems to imply that those
pages should not be possible to mmap, so either that needs to be
updated, or... how the hell could we run into those in g-u-p,
anyway? Really confused...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists