[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8qwsdUy9dT7l4OT@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 17:18:09 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Luca Ellero <l.ellero@...m.it>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, daniel@...que.org,
m.felsch@...gutronix.de, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
mkl@...gutronix.de, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, imre.deak@...ia.com,
luca.ellero@...ckedbrain.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Input: ads7846 - don't check penirq immediately for
7845
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 01:45:44PM +0100, Luca Ellero wrote:
> To discard false readings, one should use "ti,penirq-recheck-delay-usecs".
> Checking get_pendown_state() at the beginning, most of the time fails
> causing malfunctioning.
Should it have a Fixes: tag?
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ellero <l.ellero@...m.it>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists