linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: backlight: Add Kinetic KTZ8866 backlight

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y8qzXpNV5dA0UnFs@Gentoo>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2023 23:29:34 +0800
From:   Jianhua Lu <lujianhua000@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: backlight: Add Kinetic KTZ8866
 backlight

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 03:22:09PM +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 05:47:27PM +0800, Jianhua Lu wrote:
> > Add Kinetic KTZ8866 backlight binding documentation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianhua Lu <lujianhua000@...il.com>
> > [...]
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/kinetic,ktz8866.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/kinetic,ktz8866.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..b1d0ade0dfb6
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/kinetic,ktz8866.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
> > [...]
> > +  current-ramping-time-ms:
> > +    description: LED current ramping time in milliseconds.
> > +    enum: [2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 192, 256, 320, 384, 448, 512, 576, 640]
> 
> This doesn't look like it goes low enough (wasn't there a value lower
> than 2?).
> 
Yes, I have sent a v8 patch to add it.
Thanks for reply.
> 
> Daniel.