[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230120155439.GI2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 07:54:39 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Hernan Ponce de Leon <hernan.poncedeleon@...weicloud.com>,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
longman@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, akpm@...l.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, joel@...lfernandes.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, diogo.behrens@...wei.com,
jonas.oberhauser@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hernan Ponce de Leon <hernanl.leon@...wei.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix data race in mark_rt_mutex_waiters
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 06:58:20AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 1/20/2023 5:55 AM, Hernan Ponce de Leon wrote:
> > From: Hernan Ponce de Leon <hernanl.leon@...wei.com>
> >
>
> > kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> > index 010cf4e6d0b8..7ed9472edd48 100644
> > --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> > +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> > @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static __always_inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
> > unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner;
> > do {
> > - owner = *p;
> > + owner = READ_ONCE(*p);
> > } while (cmpxchg_relaxed(p, owner,
>
>
> I don't see how this makes any difference at all.
> *p can be read a dozen times and it's fine; cmpxchg has barrier semantics for compilers afaics
Doing so does suppress a KCSAN warning. You could also use data_race()
if it turns out that the volatile semantics would prevent a valuable
compiler optimization.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists