linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: dt-bindings: fixed-regulator: allow gpios property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <167423254806.1373484.8432300435483887839.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:35:48 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: dt-bindings: fixed-regulator: allow gpios
 property

On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 14:30:10 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 'gpios' is in general preferred even for single GPIO specifiers and
> there are DTS boards using it (exynos4412-p4note.dtsi), so allow both
> versions.
> 
> 

Applied to

   broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: dt-bindings: fixed-regulator: allow gpios property
      commit: 12df2c182ccb850988d2680a422211a812fb5cb2

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark