| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Y8rh2SByHp773UXu@mail.local>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 19:47:53 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
Cc: a.zummo@...ertech.it, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/14] rtc: pcf2127: adapt for time/date registers at
any offset
On 15/12/2022 10:02:03-0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
>
> This will simplify the implementation of new variants into this driver.
>
> Some variants (PCF2131) have a 100th seconds register. This register is
> currently not supported in this driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c
> index b9a5d47a439f..fb0caacaabee 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c
> @@ -44,14 +44,17 @@
> #define PCF2127_BIT_CTRL3_BF BIT(3)
> #define PCF2127_BIT_CTRL3_BTSE BIT(4)
> /* Time and date registers */
> -#define PCF2127_REG_SC 0x03
> +#define PCF2127_REG_TIME_DATE_BASE 0x03
> +/* Time and date registers offsets (starting from base register) */
> +#define PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_SC 0
> +#define PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_MN 1
> +#define PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_HR 2
> +#define PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_DM 3
> +#define PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_DW 4
> +#define PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_MO 5
> +#define PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_YR 6
Same comment as for the alarms, I would simply remove the defines as
they don't really carry any useful information.
> +/* Time and date registers bits */
> #define PCF2127_BIT_SC_OSF BIT(7)
> -#define PCF2127_REG_MN 0x04
> -#define PCF2127_REG_HR 0x05
> -#define PCF2127_REG_DM 0x06
> -#define PCF2127_REG_DW 0x07
> -#define PCF2127_REG_MO 0x08
> -#define PCF2127_REG_YR 0x09
> /* Alarm registers */
> #define PCF2127_REG_ALARM_SC 0x0A
> #define PCF2127_REG_ALARM_MN 0x0B
> @@ -106,6 +109,7 @@ struct pcf21xx_config {
> int max_register;
> unsigned int has_nvmem:1;
> unsigned int has_bit_wd_ctl_cd0:1;
> + u8 regs_td_base; /* Time/data base registers. */
> };
>
> struct pcf2127 {
> @@ -125,27 +129,31 @@ struct pcf2127 {
> static int pcf2127_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> {
> struct pcf2127 *pcf2127 = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> - unsigned char buf[10];
> + unsigned char buf[7];
> + unsigned int ctrl3;
> int ret;
>
> /*
> * Avoid reading CTRL2 register as it causes WD_VAL register
> * value to reset to 0 which means watchdog is stopped.
> */
> - ret = regmap_bulk_read(pcf2127->regmap, PCF2127_REG_CTRL3,
> - (buf + PCF2127_REG_CTRL3),
> - ARRAY_SIZE(buf) - PCF2127_REG_CTRL3);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "%s: read error\n", __func__);
> + ret = regmap_read(pcf2127->regmap, PCF2127_REG_CTRL3, &ctrl3);
> + if (ret)
> return ret;
> - }
>
> - if (buf[PCF2127_REG_CTRL3] & PCF2127_BIT_CTRL3_BLF)
> + if (ctrl3 & PCF2127_BIT_CTRL3_BLF)
> dev_info(dev,
> "low voltage detected, check/replace RTC battery.\n");
>
> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(pcf2127->regmap, pcf2127->cfg->regs_td_base,
> + buf, sizeof(buf));
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "%s: read error\n", __func__);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> /* Clock integrity is not guaranteed when OSF flag is set. */
> - if (buf[PCF2127_REG_SC] & PCF2127_BIT_SC_OSF) {
> + if (buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_SC] & PCF2127_BIT_SC_OSF) {
> /*
> * no need clear the flag here,
> * it will be cleared once the new date is saved
> @@ -158,18 +166,18 @@ static int pcf2127_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> dev_dbg(dev,
> "%s: raw data is cr3=%02x, sec=%02x, min=%02x, hr=%02x, "
> "mday=%02x, wday=%02x, mon=%02x, year=%02x\n",
> - __func__, buf[PCF2127_REG_CTRL3], buf[PCF2127_REG_SC],
> - buf[PCF2127_REG_MN], buf[PCF2127_REG_HR],
> - buf[PCF2127_REG_DM], buf[PCF2127_REG_DW],
> - buf[PCF2127_REG_MO], buf[PCF2127_REG_YR]);
> -
> - tm->tm_sec = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_REG_SC] & 0x7F);
> - tm->tm_min = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_REG_MN] & 0x7F);
> - tm->tm_hour = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_REG_HR] & 0x3F); /* rtc hr 0-23 */
> - tm->tm_mday = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_REG_DM] & 0x3F);
> - tm->tm_wday = buf[PCF2127_REG_DW] & 0x07;
> - tm->tm_mon = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_REG_MO] & 0x1F) - 1; /* rtc mn 1-12 */
> - tm->tm_year = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_REG_YR]);
> + __func__, ctrl3, buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_SC],
> + buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_MN], buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_HR],
> + buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_DM], buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_DW],
> + buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_MO], buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_YR]);
> +
> + tm->tm_sec = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_SC] & 0x7F);
> + tm->tm_min = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_MN] & 0x7F);
> + tm->tm_hour = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_HR] & 0x3F); /* rtc hr 0-23 */
You can drop the comment
> + tm->tm_mday = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_DM] & 0x3F);
> + tm->tm_wday = buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_DW] & 0x07;
> + tm->tm_mon = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_MO] & 0x1F) - 1; /* rtc mn 1-12 */
This comment too.
> + tm->tm_year = bcd2bin(buf[PCF2127_OFFSET_TD_YR]);
> tm->tm_year += 100;
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "%s: tm is secs=%d, mins=%d, hours=%d, "
> @@ -207,7 +215,7 @@ static int pcf2127_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> buf[i++] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_year - 100);
>
> /* write register's data */
> - err = regmap_bulk_write(pcf2127->regmap, PCF2127_REG_SC, buf, i);
> + err = regmap_bulk_write(pcf2127->regmap, pcf2127->cfg->regs_td_base, buf, i);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(dev,
> "%s: err=%d", __func__, err);
> @@ -650,11 +658,13 @@ static struct pcf21xx_config pcf21xx_cfg[] = {
> .max_register = 0x1d,
> .has_nvmem = 1,
> .has_bit_wd_ctl_cd0 = 1,
> + .regs_td_base = PCF2127_REG_TIME_DATE_BASE,
> },
> [PCF2129] = {
> .max_register = 0x19,
> .has_nvmem = 0,
> .has_bit_wd_ctl_cd0 = 0,
> + .regs_td_base = PCF2127_REG_TIME_DATE_BASE,
> },
> };
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists