[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8r4+V4Y42Y09WMw@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 21:26:33 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Joan Bruguera <joanbrugueram@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, mark.rutland@....com,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
Jörg Rödel <joro@...tes.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] x86/power: De-paravirt restore_processor_state()
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 03:25:36PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Since Xen PV doesn't use restore_processor_state(), and we're going to
> have to avoid CALL/RET until at least GS is restored,
Drop the "we":
"..., and CALL/RET cannot happen before GS has been restored, ..."
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists