[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44a2c301-900e-90ea-4b21-e5264102e699@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 23:36:15 +0100
From: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...weicloud.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...wei.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, will <will@...nel.org>,
"boqun.feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>, npiggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
dhowells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"j.alglave" <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
"luc.maranget" <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>, akiyks <akiyks@...il.com>,
dlustig <dlustig@...dia.com>, joel <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
urezki <urezki@...il.com>,
quic_neeraju <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
frederic <frederic@...nel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Internal vs. external barriers (was: Re: Interesting LKMM litmus
test)
On 1/20/2023 10:37 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> Just out of curiosity, are you [set] up to run LKMM locally at your end?
I don't know what exactly that means. I generally run it on wetware.
But I sometimes ask Hernan to run Dat3M (on his machine) over all the
litmus tests in your repo to spot any obvious problems with variations I
consider.
I don't think Dat3M is feature-complete with herd at the moment, just
unbelievably faster. For example I think it ignores all flags in the cat
files.
Oh, I just remembered that I also installed herd7 recently to make sure
that any patches I might send in satisfy herd7 syntax requirements (I
think you called this diagnostic driven development?), but I haven't
used it to really run anything.
Is it too obvious that my words usually aren't backed by cold machine logic?
Best wishes,
jonas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists