[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202301191627.FC1E24ED5@keescook>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:28:42 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Seth Jenkins <sethjenkins@...gle.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
tangmeng <tangmeng@...ontech.com>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] exit: Put an upper limit on how often we can oops
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 03:19:21PM -0500, Seth Jenkins wrote:
> > Do you have a plan to backport this into upstream LTS kernels?
>
> As I understand, the answer is "hopefully yes" with the big
> presumption that all stakeholders are on board for the change. There
> is *definitely* a plan to *submit* backports to the stable trees, but
> ofc it will require some approvals.
I've asked for at least v6.1.x (it's a clean cherry-pick). Earlier
kernels will need some non-trivial backporting. Is there anyone that
would be interested in stepping up to do that?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202301191532.AEEC765@keescook
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists