[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8m8CM35ku+Fuppc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:54:16 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: sam@...nborg.org,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, users@...ux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] backlight: omap1: Use backlight helpers
On Sat, 07 Jan 2023, Sam Ravnborg via B4 Submission Endpoint wrote:
> From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
>
> Rework backlight handling to avoid access to the deprecated
> backlight_properties.fb_blank member.
>
> The rework includes removal of get_brightness() operation,
> because there was no read back from HW so no use for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
> Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
> Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/omap1_bl.c | 67 +++++---------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
My tools appear to dislike the line break in the Message-Id header.
This isn't something I've encountered before. Is this a B4 thing?
Is this standard? Should I adapt my tooling to scan over line breaks?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists