[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8pMfXLvJfQfTex+@google.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 08:10:37 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: sam@...nborg.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
users@...ux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] backlight: omap1: Use backlight helpers
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 09:54:16PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > My tools appear to dislike the line break in the Message-Id header.
> > This isn't something I've encountered before. Is this a B4 thing?
>
> It's more like it's a Python thing. The upcoming version of b4 will avoid this
> (by not relying on Python to do message generation).
Understood.
> > Is this standard? Should I adapt my tooling to scan over line breaks?
>
> This is RFC conformant, so if your tools are not able to deal with this
> situation, you should consider modifying them.
Thanks for the info Konstantin, I'll do just that.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists