[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8nqWl+kOvc8WPdK@google.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 01:11:54 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] KVM: x86/cpuid: Use fast return for cpuid "0xa"
leaf when !enable_pmu
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022, Like Xu wrote:
> From: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
>
> Although when !enable_pmu, KVM will have zero-padded kvm_pmu_cap to do
> subsequent cpuid leaf assignments, one extra branch instruction saves
> a few subsequent zero-assignment instructions, speeding things up a bit.
I doubt my motivation was performance, I'm guessing I suggested adding the explicit
!enable_pmu check because relying on kvm_pmu_cap to be zeroed isn't obvious.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists