linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] Introduce a unified API for SCMI Server testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y8pkfJ11iaBiLCQh@e120937-lin>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:53:14 +0000
From:   Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        sudeep.holla@....com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, etienne.carriere@...aro.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, souvik.chakravarty@....com,
        wleavitt@...vell.com, peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com,
        nicola.mazzucato@....com, tarek.el-sherbiny@....com,
        quic_kshivnan@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] Introduce a unified API for SCMI Server testing

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 01:47:04PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> 
Hi Florian,

> On 1/18/23 04:14, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > This series aims to introduce a new SCMI unified userspace interface meant
> > to ease testing an SCMI Server implementation for compliance, fuzzing etc.,
> > from the perspective of the OSPM agent (non-secure world only ...)
> > 
> > It is proposed as a testing/development facility, it is NOT meant to be a
> > feature to use in production, but only enabled in Kconfig for test
> > deployments.
> > 
> > Currently an SCMI Compliance Suite like the one at [1] can only work by
> > injecting SCMI messages at the SCMI transport layer using the mailbox test
> > driver (CONFIG_MAILBOX_TEST) via its few debugfs entries and looking at
> > the related replies from the SCMI backend Server.
> 
> Took a while but finally:
> 
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> 

Thanks for giving it a go.

> Any idea when the raw_mode_support or the acs_raw_mode_support will hit your
> master branch in the scmi-tests repository?

I was holding off waiting for this series to be merged to be sure the
debugfs ABI was not changing anymore, so now, soon-ish, I'll move to request
merge the Raw support in the ACS too; the only further delay regarding this,
that I can think of, could be that I know QA is also adding v3.1 tests to the
ACS and they are too going for the MR in these days, so this could delay a bit
further the Raw support merge.

Thanks,
Cristian