linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] x86/cpu, kvm: Support AMD Automatic IBRS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y8p2DUtzoC409HYY@zn.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2023 12:07:57 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@....com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] x86/cpu, kvm: Support AMD Automatic IBRS

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 01:40:13AM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Sorry, completely missed this.

Nothing to be sorry for - can't notice everything in the flood. :)

> There will be a minor conflict in KVM's reverse_cpuid, but it's trivial to resolve.
> I don't anticipate any other conflicts, so taking this through tip does seem like
> the best option.

Ok, thx.

> If possible, a new version to fix the bisection issues in patches 2 and 3 would
> be nice, but again it's not a big deal.  The breakage is very, very minor.

Yap, I've zapped them and their removal will take a bit to propagate to
linux-next.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette