linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] ASoC: cs42l42: Add Soundwire support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2023 12:31:53 +0000
From:   Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Stefan Binding <sbinding@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] ASoC: cs42l42: Add Soundwire support

On 19/1/23 16:27, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> 
>>> You lost me here. Are you saying the soundwire bus clock is only known
>>> in the prepare stage?
>>>
>>
>> hw_params() doesn't know the Soundwire bus clock so it can't do the
>> check. We need to wait until we have both the sample rate and the
>> chosen SWIRE_CLK.
> 
> Yes, makes sense. I forgot that all the stream management and bandwidth
> allocation takes place in the prepare stage at the dailink level, and
> the dai prepare happens after that. Thanks for the clarification.

Also, this isn't validating the params passed by the application.
The application cannot pass us "bad" params that would cause pll_config
to fail.

The only way the pll_config could fail is if the SoundWire core code
chose a SWIRE_CLK that CS42L42 cannot support. This should never happen
and if it does it means there's an error in the ACPI or the machine
driver.