linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] iommu: The early demise of bus ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y8qKK78BecPNpf+Q@8bytes.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2023 13:33:47 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     will@...nel.org, hch@....de, jgg@...dia.com, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] iommu: The early demise of bus ops

Hi Robin,

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 07:18:18PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> This is sort of an RFC, in the sense that the patches are functionally
> ready but I don't expect that we necessarily want to merge all them
> right away; at this point it's more for the sake of visibility and
> checking if anyone strongly objects to the direction I'm taking. As such
> I've based these patches on 6.2-rc3 and made no effort to integrate them
> with the IOMMUFD-related work going on in parallel and/or already
> queued, even though there is some functional intersection and almost
> certain conflicts. If we reach a consensus that we would like any of
> this for 6.3 I'll rebase as appropriate.

Thanks for doing this, I like the direction this is taking! I see no
strict reason to wait with this, but also no strict reason to hurry it
in.

I would say we have another week for this to get ready to be merged into
6.3, which means having a version based on iommu/core with the reviews
addressed and enough relevant Reviewed-by's.

Regards,

	Joerg