[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230120073942-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 07:40:28 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: jasowang@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, elena.reshetova@...el.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Harden a few virtio bits
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 02:32:09PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 03:57:15PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Here are 6 patches that harden console, net and 9p drivers against
> >> various malicious host input as well as close a bounds check bypass
> >> in the split virtio ring.
> >
> > Hardening against buggy devices is one thing,
> > Hardening against malicious devices is another.
> > Which is this?
>
> Well, the big difference is the intent, but buggy input is buggy input,
> they've got that in common and we're trying to deal with it here.
>
> The motivation for this patchset is protecting against malicious
> devices.
>
> > If really malicious, aren't there any spectre considerations here?
> > I am for example surprised not to find anything addressing
> > spectre v1 nor any uses of array_index_nospec here.
>
> That's strange, patch 6/6 is exactly that. There's probably more coming
> in the future as the analysis and audit progress.
>
> Regards,
Oh I see, didn't get it for some reason. Pulled it from lore now.
> --
> Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists