[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8qZU33Cvbc7p7DE@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 14:38:27 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Linux-RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/rwbase: Prevent indefinite writer starvation
On 2023-01-20 13:24:41 [+0000], Mel Gorman wrote:
> --- a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
> @@ -264,12 +291,17 @@ static int __sched rwbase_write_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
> if (__rwbase_write_trylock(rwb))
> break;
>
> + /* Record timeout when reader bias is ignored. */
> + rwb->waiter_timeout = jiffies + RWBASE_RT_WAIT_TIMEOUT;
rwb->waiter_timeout = (jiffies + RWBASE_RT_WAIT_TIMEOUT) | 1;
There is the unlikely case that (jiffies + RWBASE_RT_WAIT_TIMEOUT) = 0
on 32bit where it is not jiffies64.
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> +
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
> rwbase_schedule();
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
>
> set_current_state(state);
> }
> +
> + rwb->waiter_timeout = 0;
> rwbase_restore_current_state();
> trace_contention_end(rwb, 0);
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists